No, it’s not a European car, but if you ever wanted a virtual test drive around the Nürburgring in a Nissan GT-R, well, here is your chance!
Dirk Schoysman gives PistonHeads a tour of the Nurburgring at the wheel of a Nissan GT-R
Volkswagen
VW in an effort to promote the tons of eco-friendlier cars launched at IAA in Frankfurt in September has decided to pursue eco-sales with a new eco-friendly racing series. The company is starting a single-make racing series where all of the cars run on bio-produced compressed natural gas. The model used in the series is the new Scirocco and should reduce racetrack CO2 output by 80 per cent over today’s racing fuels. The 2.0-liter 4-cylinder cars will have 220 horsepower on tap. Not bad for an alt fuel car!
Source: http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/10/volkswagen-cng/
On other green fronts, VW Group is working with Stanford University in California in a US$5.75 million project to make VW the largest carmaker with R&D in Silicon Valley. Already the two companies have produced autonomous (read self-driving) versions of the VW Passat and now the Audi TT-S. The Audi TT-S will attempt to drive itself up the 14,110-foot Pike’s Peak next year, according Wired.
Source: http://www.wired.com/autopia/2009/10/vw-vail/
Audi’s Johan de Nysschen, critical of the Chevy Volt, took an interview with Time recently to express his views on the state of the luxury auto industry. He stated that Audi’s goal is to be the “top” German luxury manufacturer, but not necessarily in terms of sales. He also reiterated the push for more fuel-efficient vehicles leading to Zero emissions cars in the not so distant future.
Source: http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1933906,00.html
Bugatti
Bugatti has unleashed a new concept car the 4-seat, 4-door (can you believe it???) Galibier 16C. Autocar magazine claims the production will start in 2013 at £900,000. We will believe it when we see it! Interestingly, the car’s engine will be the same as in the Veyron but will only sport 800BHP. Apparently, 200 get lost when adding 2 doors.
http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?AR=244753
Caterham
Rarely does Caterham make the news, except when they unleash new, wildly fun lightweight roadster, but unfortunately, Caterham’s found Graham Nearn died in late October. Nearn has been selling the then-titled Lotus 7 since its introduction in 1959, and then when the car was discontinued in 1973, Nearn bought the rights and has been producing the car ever since and in more exciting, evolving versions. You can even buy a kit and put a Caterham 7 together yourself. If you are not familiar with this brand, you should be!
Top Gear featured it in a segment awhile back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOxHV6QfJkg
Source: http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.aspx?AR=244398
Ferrari
Beyond the KM has previously marveled at the sales resiliency of the Ferrari nameplate. But even THIS economy has the prancing stallion kow-towing to the bear market of Wall Street.
Its third quarter results for 2009 showed revenues of 396 million euros (£359m) – down from 450m euros (£408m) in the same period last year. It sold 1454 cars, down 4.3 per cent year on year.
However, Ferrari announced that it has grown its market share in every market it monitors, against a drop in supercar sales of around 40 per cent.
Oh those crazy French ads…always the same end, but always a different means…
It should come as no surprise to most that Renault’s number have been “off” in the EU. Many have argued that earlier success by Carlos Ghosn was due to lucky timing. At his arrival, Renault was in the midst of a product renaissance of sorts. The result of the company-wide product refresh was impressive sales, which included large profits. Fast forward to 2007 and the honeymoon is all but over for Ghosn.
Renault announced today that EU sales for March 2007 dropped 5.6% from March 2006. Sales for the Renault brand worldwide dropped 7.2%. Despite this, Renault still continues to have its largest market penetration in two EU countries, Romania and France.
While Renault struggled in the EU, the results were not so disappointing worldwide. In fact marketing and sales executives should be pleased that Renault has performed best in non-EU countries. On a Russian market that rose 11.5%, Renault confirmed its remarkable sales growth with a 63.2% increase thanks to the success of the Logan and the entire product line. Renault reported record sales in Algeria in the first quarter, up 29%. Renault continued to advance in the Americas, with sales rising by 10.6%. Sales were up 20% in Brazil and 75.1% in Venezuela. The biggest growth in the first quarter came from Argentina (+50.2%) and Venezuela (+87.8%).
The overall result may be disappointing to some at Renault but it is good news that European manufacturers can thrive outside of the EU. While the USA has long been a key market for the Germans, the French have long been outsiders in the USA, and show no signs of returning. Of course, Renault can always rely on Nissan if they need help across the pond. We would expect sales to be strong for the next months due to the latest product announcements, but Renault will have to improve in the EU, its core market, if it expects the year to go well.
Sources: Renault
You probably knew that Renault has been responsible for championships in F1 during the last two seasons. But did you know that Renault’s F1 team spends just one-fifth of other F1 teams?
Check out this link: http://news.com.com/2100-11389_3-6169931.html?part=rss&tag=2547-1_3-0-5&subj=news
The big news today was of course DaimlerChrysler has announced massive layoffs – 16% or 13,000 – of their total US workforce at the Chrysler division. One article here. The layoffs come as Chrysler division struggles to bring costs under control and at the same time roll out highly successful products. Of late, Daimler’s US brand has successfully rolled out well-designed products, some of which have certain cachet to American buyers. Still, they have struggled to find mass-market appeal in key vehicles such as the Chrysler Crossfire and the Aspen. Most successful has been the 300C. A large part of this success can attributed to the designers – and the customizers who seem to “pimp” nearly every Black 300C to hit the road. God knows they aren’t buying the car for the amazing handling and braking (perhaps the 300C is meant to be a drag racer).
To return to the main point, European manufacturers are looking to cut costs. Most notably the changes are affecting Peugeot. Both Renault and PSA Peugeot-Citroën have gone from strong product lineups a few years ago to abysmal performance today. Sales are off and both companies are working to improve. Renault with the key ownership of Nissan is in a much different position than Peugeot. 2006 results showed that Peugeot sales slipped .7% to 1,960,000 from 1,995,000 the year prior. In line with these results Peugeot axed the CEO at the beginning of the year and has installed former Airbus and Saint-Gobain executive Christian Streiff.
Unlike Nissan-Renault’s Carlos Ghosn, who seeks to develop broad global alliances, Streiff is seen as a master of cost cutting. It is widely speculated that such cost cutting could come in the form of plant closure in France, Spain, or the UK as noted by the Financial Times earlier this month. Streiff could take two different approaches or a hybrid. One option would be to sell or spin off certain parts of Peugeot’s vertically integrated infrastructure, thus freeing up cash flow and at the same time driving cost competition among suppliers. A second, less likely, approach would be to adopt the aforementioned alliance schematic that Ghosn has adopted at Nissan-Renault.
We will continue to research and write about this topic for future articles, but we would close by noting that the auto industry is nearly cyclical in nature. VW with its governance problems, and Fiat with problems in every area, were considered in recent years to be quite poor off. VW has made a great comeback with 9.3% sales increase and Fiat’s turn around is also worth noting. Bottom-line is that the French automakers may be a bit down, but they are certainly not out.
Sources: Financial Times, January 9, 2007.
Examples of the latest Peugeot
Maybe ING saw our posting and saw the benefit of a sponsorship with the Renault Formula 1 team. Maybe they are just making too much money and need to “make an investment.” Either way the Dutch Banking and Insurance giant has signed a 3-year deal with team Renault for some prime ad space, and name sponsorship, on the next series of cars.
It is quite clear that Formula One reaches far more people than NASCAR in the US or GT racing in Europe. Despite running 2007 sans Fernando Alonso (two-time F1 champion), Renault has a full-sponsorship. ING CEO Michel Tilmant is right to think that F1 is an opportunity to build the ING brand globally in a quick way. The Shell-Ferrari relationship is a similar example.
Lessons in brand management that when you spend marketing dollars, they should be spent to gain positive exposure for the brand. The idea is to associate the brand with a winning concept. Renault has certainly proven itself a winner the last two years. It is estimated that the contract was equivalent to 5% of ING’s global marketing budget. We estimate that such a deal is worth over $85 million per annum.
One final note: our earlier analysis stated that sponsorship opportunities would come as a result of big tobacco being forced out of F1 racing in most countries. That foresight has proven correct as ING will replace a number of previous Renault sponsors, including Japanese Tobacco.
For the last billion years, motor sports, and more specifically Formula 1, has been dominated quite solidly by Scuderia Ferrari and its hallowed driver, Michael Schumacher. Last weekend marked the end of Michael Schumacher’s career and the end of Scuderia Ferrari.
That’s not to say that Ferrari won’t be returning to racing next year. Quite the opposite, actually. Felipe Massa will return to Ferrari next year along with a new teammate, Kimi Raikkonen. Both racers have achieved great respect and success of the GP circuit. Ferrari, despite coming in second in the constructor’s championship this year, will be powering more vehicles for next year. Unfortunately for Scuderia Ferrari, much of the technical team that helped Michael Schumacher win dozens of races and six championships is splitting up.
With so many changes, on might ask: will Formula 1 ever be the same? To answer this is to realize which changes will be made. First, no Schumacher in 2007. Fernando Alonso may be the best driver next year, and for all we know, he may eventually become the best of all time, but he is unlikely to have the same pull or marketing appeal to the sport that Schumacher brought.
Second Renault and Ferrari are both suffering from major team changes at the end of this year. Renault stands to lose everything with the change of its champion drive. Ferrari is likely to be diluted by having to produce more engines for more teams, assembling a new management team, and leaving Massa to take over for a top driver.
Third and most importantly, the money that pours into Formula 1 will be changing. New EU rules outlaw the Marlboro type of advertising. These new rules have prompted an exodus from F1 by tobacco companies including British American Tobacco (producer of Lucky Strike cigarettes), once a title partner with the Honda team will exit. Marlboro has promised to stay on with Ferrari, but will be severely limited in advertising for the 2007 season onward. This regulation means that some teams will have a very difficult time finding major sponsors for next year. Formula 1 after all, is not cheap to run. On the upside, Speed TV in the U.S. has succeeded in paying a lot of money to the Formula 1 Administration to broadcast races next year, so no team is likely to be starving.
There was little surprise in today’s final Formula 1 race of the season. There were however many retirements, several car failures and accidents.
The important story of the day was Felipe Massa’s win, the first by a Brazilian since Ayrton Senna in 1993 on the home track. Massa dominated from the beginning and finished with a substantial lead over Fernando Alonso who finished second followed by an impressive third place finish by Jensen Button.
The finish meant that Fernando Alonso won the 2006 F1 Championship and Renault walked away with the Constructor’s Championship. It also meanth that with Schumacher finishing fourth, up from his 10th place start, that Ferrari finished second in the Constructor’s competition.
As for Michael Schumacher, today marked his last F1 race, but also represented an impressive display of driving. Early in the race, Schumacher’s left rear tire was nicked resulting in a very early pit stop, costing him dearly. He rejoined at the back of the pack. Combined with several retirements and what can only be described as amazing driving, Schumacher worked his way from 17th (after the pit stop) to fourth by the end of the race.
It is the end of the 2006 season and the end of Schumacher’s career, but 2007 will hold new challenges for Formula 1 with many changes for many teams and changes to the sport, some of which will affect the business-side of Formula 1.
Check back soon when Beyond the KM discusses implications of changes that F1 will make over the break and how that will affect the sport.
Change is afoot in corporate offices in Europe’s automakers. GM and Ford have struggled for many years now with the harsh realities of the global auto market. Now those realities are knocking on the doors of the European automakers. About two-thirds of Western Europe’s carmakers have seen changes in the executive suite in the last two years.
The reasons vary, e.g. BMW’s Helmut Panke left due to age restrictions, yet the BMW board failed to grant him a waive to allow him to drive the ultimate machine longer. The fact remains though that boardrooms and shareholders, alike, are concerned about increasing competition from the Far East.
Once a joke to respectable manufacturers, the Chinese automakers – led by Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) and Nanjing Automobile – are increasingly competitive. The Chinese are increasingly developing more and more sophisticated facilities and borrowing more and more from the Europeans. Take American Axle and Manufacturing. AAM has been setting up new factories at breakneck pace. Indeed some of the intellectual property has been sold to the Chinese as well.
What all of this means is that the Chinese now have a way to produce good quality cars, yet sell them for next to nothing. Therein lies the problem not just for Renault and Peugeot and VW. Mercedes-Benz and BMW must be careful in their strategies since companies like Chery, is planning to bring their “luxury” automotives to the U.S. market soon. At $20,000 Mercedes and BMW are tracking the company, you can be sure. In the end, automakers will find difficulty in beating the Chinese on price. They must find other ways or they will falter as Ford and GM have done.
The next part in this topic will deal with possible strategies that the European automakers might develop to combat the competition from the east.
You are currently browsing the archives for the Renault category.
